Third Party Agreement vs Service Level Agreement: Which Model is Right for Your School?

	Third Party Agreement	Service Level Agreement
Who manages compliance	RTO manages all compliance	Shared — RTO provides oversight
Who marks assessments	RTO	Shared — varies by agreement
Best for	Schools wanting minimum admin burden	Schools wanting more program control
SAS funding access	Yes — primary model for SAS programs	May apply — confirm with RTO
Teacher requirements	Teacher Enhancement Skill Set recommended	TAE40122 typically required
Blueprint offering	Yes	Yes

Are you currently registered with ASQA and does your scope include the qualifications I want to offer?
Are you an approved Skills Assure Supplier for the current year? (Queensland schools)
How many secondary schools do you currently deliver VETiS programs to?
Who manages assessment marking — the school or you?
What does your compliance management include, and what does it not include?
Can you provide references from current school partners?
What professional development support do you provide for facilitating teachers?
What happens if a student needs to withdraw mid-program?
What is your process if a student fails an assessment?
What is your current ASQA compliance status?

Want to put these questions to Blueprint directly?

Contact Blueprint — for a no-obligation conversation about your school's VETiS requirements.

Blueprint Career Development | RTO #30978 | blueprintcd.com.au

Compare the two main VETiS delivery models and the questions worth asking before you sign with any provider.